DS Cohen & Associates
Corporate America’s Values Dilemma Rings in 2025
As we embark on the 2025 journey, the corporate landscape is becoming ever more perplexing as a significant ethical challenge has emerged: the retreat from Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Is this retreat a sign of the beginning of a departure from existing corporate values? This trend, sparked by political pressures and legal challenges, has created a stark divide between companies that compromise their values and those that stand firm.
This divergence raises critical questions about corporate ethics, leadership integrity, and the role of businesses in shaping societal values versus reflecting them.
The Retreat from Their Values: A Concerning Trend
Several major corporations have scaled back or eliminated their DEI initiatives.
Walmart has rolled back its DEI policies, ending racial equity training and reevaluating supplier diversity programs. Walmart is not alone, as other companies like Harley-Davidson, Tractor Supply Co., and John Deere have also modified or reduced their DEI efforts.
Meta has discontinued its DEI programs, including hiring, training, and supplier selection initiatives. This decision comes alongside other changes that suggest a shift towards accommodating conservative interests, such as ensuring posts are no longer fact-based or without hate or malicious.
Amazon phased out what it calls “outdated” DEI materials and initiatives.
Ford Motor Company announced significant reductions to its DEI programs in August 2024, including ending minority hiring quotas and removing diversity-related performance metrics from executive compensation.
McDonald’s has eliminated aspirational representation quotas and discontinued its Supply Chain’s Mutual Commitment to DEI pledge.
Standing Firm: Companies Upholding Their Values
In contrast, some companies are maintaining their commitment to their values:
Apple has taken a strong stance against anti-DEI proposals. They rejected a shareholder proposal to eliminate its DEI programs.
Costco has also defended its DEI policies, urging shareholders to reject proposals that would end them.
Target continues to support its DEI policies, even defending itself in court against a lawsuit claiming the retailer misled investors about the financial risks of its DEI practices.
The Ethical Implications of Compromise
The retreat from DEI initiatives by major corporations raises serious ethical concerns:
1. Compromising Values: Companies like Walmart and Meta appear to be prioritizing political expediency over long-standing commitments to their stated values. This shift calls into question the authenticity of their corporate values and will compromise their corporate culture.
2. Short-term Thinking: By capitulating to political pressures, these companies may sacrifice the long-term benefits of a values-based workforce for short-term political favour or avoid controversy. This implies the espoused values were not, in fact, their authentic values.
3. Reinforcing Inequality: Scaling back DEI initiatives could perpetuate existing inequalities in the workplace, potentially reversing years of progress toward creating more inclusive corporate environments.
4. Ethical Leadership: The contrasting approaches of companies like Apple and Costco versus those retreating from their values\ highlight the importance of courageous ethical leadership in times of political and social pressure.
The Canary in the Coal Mine: Employee Concerns and Cultural Dissonance
The retreat from DEI can be seen as a “canary in the coal mine,” signalling a potential disconnect between leadership decisions and long-standing corporate values. Simply put, the espoused ‘core’ values were never their values. This shift creates tension for employees who have internalized and lived by these values: the sudden, unexplained change in values undermines company cultures and employee morale and trust.
The employee response reinforces that values, the foundation for corporate culture, are not fluid and can’t be changed at will. This is why culture change efforts inevitably fail. Here are some of the signs of discontent.
1. Confusion and Disappointment: Employees who have been part of organizations that strongly promoted DEI and their company’s values initiatives feel confused and disappointed by the sudden change in direction. This shift creates a sense of cognitive dissonance, especially for those who were actively involved and felt psychologically safe in the long-established work environment
2. Erosion of Trust: The abrupt abandonment of DEI commitments may lead employees to question the sincerity of other company values and initiatives. This erosion of trust can have far-reaching consequences on employee engagement and loyalty, as they now perceive leaders lacking integrity.
3. Cultural Whiplash: Employees may experience a form of cultural whiplash as they try to reconcile the previous emphasis on diversity and inclusion with the new direction. This can lead to uncertainty about what the company truly stands for.
4. Recruitment and Retention: Companies already see signs of discontent over the shift from their long-standing cultures on social media. The social media posts erode their employer brand, negatively impacting the attraction of some highly desired new employees.
Signs of Employee Concern
1. Internal Dissent: At Meta, employees have reportedly expressed frustration and concern over the company’s decision to scale back DEI efforts. This internal pushback indicates that employees are not aligned with leadership decisions.
2. Public Statements: Some employees from companies like Walmart have taken to social media or given interviews expressing their disappointment and concern about the changes in DEI policies.
3. Increased Turnover: While specific data is not yet available, there are indications that companies retreating from DEI commitments may see increased turnover, especially among underrepresented groups who may feel less supported or valued.
4. Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) Response: In some companies, ERGs focused on diversity and inclusion have become more vocal, organizing discussions and seeking clarification from leadership about the changes.
The Business Case for Remaining Uncompromising
It’s crucial to note that being uncompromising about your values is an ethical imperative and a business advantage. Research has consistently shown that values-based companies are more innovative, make better decisions, and ultimately perform better financially. For instance, a 2015 McKinsey report found that companies in the top quartile for ethnic and racial diversity in management were 35% more likely to have financial returns above their industry mean.
Companies that remain uncompromising in their commitment to their values reap several benefits:
1. Talent Attraction and Retention: Companies with firm value commitments are more likely to attract and retain top talent, especially from diverse backgrounds. This can lead to a more innovative and competitive workforce.
2. Enhanced Employee Experience: Employees who feel their values align with the company’s values and actions are more likely to feel psychologically safe and be engaged and productive. This can lead to higher performance and lower turnover rates.
3. Positive Brand Perception: Companies committed to their values enjoy a more positive brand perception among consumers and potential hires. This can have long-term benefits for the company’s market position and ability to attract talent.
4. Improved Decision-Making: Diverse teams have been shown to make better and more innovative decisions. Companies can ensure they continue to benefit from diverse perspectives by maintaining a commitment to DEI. When leaders stay the course of the values, employees have a better understanding and support for decisions.
Conclusion: The Power of Stay With Your Values
2025 is starting the age of corporate values compromise. When values are tested, courageous leadership withstands external political challenges. Companies like Apple, Costco, and Target demonstrate that it’s possible to remain uncompromising in their commitment to values, including DEI, while running successful, respected, and profitable operations.
The path forward will be challenging for companies that have sacrificed their values. Their actions raise questions about their integrity. They will need to rebuild trust with employees, reveal their authentic values, and find ways to find employees who align with them. Making politically expedient decisions that contradict the company’s values will cause the leadership’s integrity to be questioned for some time.
For companies that have remained steadfast, the challenge will be to continue ensuring they stay relevant and effective in an ever-changing business landscape, remaining true to their values in all decisions, big and small.
Ultimately, remaining uncompromising in the new age of compromise requires courage and a long-term perspective. It means recognizing that authentic, ethical leadership demands standing firm in the face of adversity and political pressure. As we navigate the complex ethical landscape of 2025 and beyond, these uncompromising companies are well positioned to thrive, continue to attract top talent, drive innovation, and contribute positively to a fair and just society.
Now is your turn to contribute your perspective on the discussion on LINKEDIN
David Cohen is completing his second book on how to hire for fit to values/culture. His first book is called The Talent Edge. He has conducted workshops globally on Structured Behavioural Interviewing. For more information on the workshop, please contact DAVID.
